· BUGHERD VS RUTTL · COMPARED FOR AGENCIES
Both let clients pin feedback on a live page and comment for free. The fork: BugHerd manages that feedback on its own built-in board and leaves the page alone. Ruttl adds a genuine edit mode, so you can change text, layout, and code on the live page, plus a real Approve-page sign-off gate.
Pick BugHerd
if you want feedback pinned on the live page and managed on a self-contained board, with deep PM integrations and predictable per-tier pricing as your team grows.
Pick Ruttl
if you want to make live visual and code edits on the page itself, want a real Approve-page sign-off gate, and are comfortable starting on a free tier with tight caps.
Both assume a person finds every mistake.
We make Superflow, a third option in this space. It appears once, at the end, clearly marked. Everything above it is a straight comparison.
Facts checked July 2026, from bugherd.com and ruttl.com.
Start with the question everything else depends on.
Verdict
Even. In both tools, finding the mistake is a person's job. Ruttl layers in two narrow AI helpers, comment sentiment and performance suggestions, that assist the review but do not check the site itself.
BugHerd
(verified July 2026)
Ruttl
(verified July 2026)
Both make commenting easy. The sign-off step is where they differ.
Verdict
Comment collection: even, both free and open to guests. A recorded sign-off: Ruttl has a verified gate in Approve page; BugHerd's approval flow is not yet verified.
BugHerd
(verified July 2026 except where noted)
Ruttl
(verified July 2026)
Both work on the live page. One also lets you change it.
Verdict
Reviewing the live page: even, both do it. Changing the page itself: Ruttl, with Edit mode; a BugHerd equivalent: not yet verified.
BugHerd
(verified July 2026 except where noted)
Ruttl
(verified July 2026)
Your team needs somewhere to disagree before the client sees it.
Verdict
Ruttl names the feature; on BugHerd, private comments are not yet verified. The question that matters, whether either tool actually hides the comment from the client, is not yet verified on either.
BugHerd
Ruttl
Both pin the exact spot. What rides along with the pin differs.
Verdict
Video feedback: even, both real. Metadata: BugHerd has a verified claim (browser, OS, screen size); Ruttl's equivalent is not yet verified. Automatic screenshots: a dash on both.
BugHerd
(verified July 2026 except where noted)
Ruttl
(verified July 2026 except where noted)
Does project ten start smarter than project one?
Verdict
Even: neither. Ruttl's versioning is project history, not client memory.
BugHerd
(checked July 2026)
Ruttl
(checked July 2026)
Both ship a built-in board. The integration lists mostly overlap.
Verdict
Even on the core list: both name Jira, Trello, Asana, Slack, and ClickUp, plus a built-in kanban. Ruttl gates ClickUp to Pro and up; BugHerd lists ClickUp among its integrations, and whether a tier gate applies is not yet verified. Native two-way sync: not yet verified on either side.
BugHerd
(verified July 2026)
Ruttl
(verified July 2026 except where noted)
The sticker and the seat math are different numbers.
Verdict
Per seat: BugHerd runs from $10 down to $6 per member as tiers grow; Ruttl Pro is a flat $18 per user regardless of headcount. Smaller teams often land cheaper on Ruttl's free tier or BugHerd's Standard; larger teams often land cheaper on BugHerd's higher tiers. Both keep guests free with no page-view caps advertised.
BugHerd
(verified July 2026)
Ruttl
(verified July 2026)
The scorecard
| The job | ||
|---|---|---|
| Who checks the site | a person | a person; Ruttl AI: sentiment, performance suggestions |
| How the client says yes | free guest comments; approval gate - | free guest comments, no signup; Approve page gate |
| Where you review | on-page pins, live site; behind-login - | live page, Comment and Edit modes; extension for logins |
| What stays private | - | private comments named, capped; client-hidden scope - |
| What gets captured | browser, OS, screen size; video; auto-screenshots - | pixel-pinned comments; video; auto-screenshots -, metadata - |
| What it remembers | no | no |
| How it fits your stack | built-in kanban; Jira, Trello, Asana, ClickUp, Slack, Teams | built-in kanban; Slack, Trello, Asana, Jira, ClickUp Pro+, Zapier; sync - |
| What it costs | $50 / $80 / $150 per month, +$8/member | Free (seat count conflict) / $18 per user per month / Custom |
Pricing, side by side
Both columns verified July 2026.
BugHerd
Ruttl
The math
At small team sizes, Ruttl's flat per-seat Pro price often undercuts BugHerd's Standard; at larger member counts, BugHerd's per-tier pricing, as low as $6 per seat on Premium, can undercut Ruttl's flat $18.
The third option
Superflow is a QA tool + a team: AI agents built from your checklist check every site change, your team decides, your client approves from a link.
Free to start. No credit card. Your client reviews without an account.
The collaborative platform for modern web teams.
Have Questions? Reach out anytime.
BugHerd if feedback should live on a self-contained board with deep PM integrations; Ruttl if you want to edit the live page directly and want a free tier to start on.
No on both. BugHerd and Ruttl guests comment free from a shareable link, no signup on either.
Ruttl's Basic is free with tight caps (1 project, 5 pages, 10 comments) and a seat count its own pages disagree on; its Pro is a flat $18 per user. BugHerd starts at $50 per month for 5 members. Price both against your team size and the caps.
No. Both collect what a person found. Ruttl's AI adds comment sentiment analysis and performance suggestions; nothing in either tool scans the site for mistakes on its own. That's the third option above.
Ruttl's Edit mode lets you change text, images, layout, and HTML and CSS on the live page without touching code. A BugHerd equivalent is not yet verified; BugHerd pins feedback for someone else to fix.
Related