# Superflow vs Marker.io

> Marker.io is a bug reporting tool. Superflow is that plus AI agents built from your checklist. They check every change; clients approve from a link.

This is the Markdown copy of https://usesuperflow.ai/comparisons/superflow-vs-marker-io, published for AI agents and scripts. The HTML page is canonical.

## Key facts

| Field | Value |
| --- | --- |
| Page type | Head-to-head comparison |
| URL | https://usesuperflow.ai/comparisons/superflow-vs-marker-io |
| Compares | Superflow vs Marker.io |
| Facts checked on | 2026-07-01 |
| Disclosure | Published by Superflow. Superflow is one of the tools compared. |
| Last updated | 2026-07-01 |

## Dimension by dimension

| Dimension | Superflow | Marker.io | Verdict |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Who checks the site | Agents run your checklist. Every change, desktop and mobile. Findings land as pinned comments, rationale attached. | A person finds every issue, then reports it. Its AI edits, translates, and titles report text. Its MCP sends bug context to outside AI agents like Claude and Cursor, useful for dev handoff. Nothing in Marker.io looks at the site to find problems. (verified marker.io/ai, July 2026) | A bug report is a record of what a person already caught. That's the part Superflow removes. |
| How the client says yes | Multi-step review flows: agents check, your team gates, then the client. Your client opens a link and taps Approve. No account, no login, no app, from their phone. | Reporters submit free from the widget, no account, and can follow their own issues. Ongoing client collaborators are paid guest seats: 10 on Starter, 50 on Team. A formal approval flow: not yet verified. (verified July 2026 except where noted) | Marker.io's free reporting is good. The difference is the gate: in Superflow, the client's yes is a recorded step, not a comment. |
| Where you review | Superflow lives on the site itself: passwords, Okta, SSO, no extension needed, guests included. Findings tagged by device. | You annotate a screenshot capture of the page; the report carries the picture, not a persistent on-page pin. Widget on the live site, browser extension for members on any webpage. Behind-login behavior: not yet verified. (verified July 2026 except where noted) | Superflow reviews the page itself, live, behind logins and SSO. Marker.io files a picture of it. Behind logins, the Marker.io side is pending verification. |
| What stays private | Internal-only notes your team sees and the client never does. The debate stays private; the client sees one settled answer. | Internal comments on every plan, including Starter. (verified marker.io/pricing, July 2026) | Close to even. Marker.io ships internal comments on every plan, including its entry tier, the same job Superflow's internal-only comments do. |
| What gets captured | Element and text pins, area comments. A screenshot attaches to every comment automatically. Recordings: screen, video, voice, from the toolbar. | Screenshot capture plus environment details (browser, OS, webpage, screen size) on every plan. Console logs, network requests, and session replay of the last three minutes, on the Team plan and up. (verified marker.io/pricing, marker.io/features, July 2026) | Marker.io's technical capture is genuinely strong. It just starts on the Team plan. Superflow's screenshots and recordings ship on every plan. |
| What it remembers | Brand rules and past decisions, learned once, fed to the agents next project. | No memory concept. Each project starts blank. (checked July 2026) | The tenth project should not start like the first. |
| How it fits your stack | Custom statuses, client gates, kanban. Two-way Asana, Monday, ClickUp. Slack built in. | Feedback becomes a ticket in your tracker; the tracker is the workspace. Thirteen-plus integrations, dev-side especially: GitHub, GitLab, Linear, Bitbucket. Jira from the Team plan. Azure DevOps plan gate: not yet verified. Two-way Issue sync is real, but a Team plan feature: Done in Jira flips to Resolved in Marker.io. (verified marker.io/integrations, marker.io/pricing, July 2026) | If your delivery runs on a dev tracker, Marker.io fits it deeply. We sync two-way with Asana, Monday, and ClickUp. We have no built-in Jira sync today. |

## Scorecard

| Measure | Marker.io | Superflow |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Who checks the site | a person | agents, from your checklist |
| How the client says yes | free reporters; paid guest seats; approval gate - | a recorded approval: team gate, then client gate |
| Where you review | annotated screenshot into the tracker; behind logins - | live site, behind logins and SSO, no extension |
| What stays private | internal comments, all plans | internal-only comments |
| What gets captured | screenshot, environment details; console logs, network requests, session replay Team+ | automatic screenshots; screen, video, voice |
| What it remembers | no | Memory, per client |
| How it fits your stack | ticket in your tracker; 13+ integrations; two-way Issue sync Team+ | statuses, client gates, kanban; two-way Asana, Monday, ClickUp; Slack |
| What it costs | Starter $39/mo annual, Team $149/mo annual, Business custom (July 2026) | Free plan; Growth $29 per seat/mo ($24 annual); Scale $34; Enterprise custom |

## Where Superflow fits

Marker.io earned its place. Feedback becomes a ticket in the tracker your team already runs, and status syncs back on the Team plan. Console logs, network requests, and session replay attach to reports with real technical depth, on the Team plan and up. Reporters are free and unlimited, no account needed.

## Pricing

Verified July 2026: Starter $39/mo annual ($59 monthly), 3 users, 10 projects, 10 guests, 5k page views/mo. Team $149/mo annual ($199 monthly), 15 users, 50 projects, 50 guests, 25k page views/mo. Business custom, yearly only. No free plan. 15-day trial, no card.

From the Growth plan. See /pricing.

## Sources

- https://marker.io
- https://marker.io/pricing
- https://marker.io/ai
- https://marker.io/features
- https://marker.io/features/session-replay
- https://marker.io/integrations
- https://marker.io/jira-bug-tracking-tool
- https://marker.io/blog/jira-plugins-addons

## Questions and answers

### Is Superflow just Marker.io with AI on top?

No. Marker.io's AI edits and retitles what a person already reported; Superflow's agents do the finding. A person makes every call.

### Do the agents replace my reviewers?

No. Agents run the first pass. Your team, then your client, signs off.

### What happens to our Marker.io projects?

Finish them in Marker.io. Start new work in Superflow. Nothing migrates on day one.

### Will our clients have to learn a new tool?

No. They get a link and an Approve button. No account, no login, no app, from their phone.

### We push tickets to Jira from Marker.io.

Superflow syncs two-way with Asana, Monday, and ClickUp, plus webhooks and a REST API. Jira is not built in today; if Jira runs your delivery, weigh that.

### What does it cost?

From the Growth plan. See /pricing.

## Related pages

Each of these also publishes a Markdown copy at its own path plus `.md`.

- [The 5 best Marker.io alternatives](https://usesuperflow.ai/alternative/marker-io-alternative)
- [BugHerd vs Marker.io](https://usesuperflow.ai/comparisons/bugherd-vs-marker-io)
- [AI review agents](https://usesuperflow.ai/ai-review-agents)

## About Superflow

Superflow is a website and creative-asset review tool. Its agents watch every page of a site, report what changed, and route findings to the people who approve them. Teams leave contextual feedback on live sites, staging environments, PDFs, images, videos, and Lottie animations, and comments sync two-way with Asana, ClickUp, Monday, Slack, Webflow, and Google Tag Manager.

Machine-readable entry points:

- Site index: https://usesuperflow.ai/llms.txt
- Full site content in one fetch: https://usesuperflow.ai/llms-full.txt
- Free tools, with a Markdown copy of each: https://usesuperflow.ai/tools.md
- MCP server (Streamable HTTP, no account and no API key): https://usesuperflow.ai/api/mcp
- Agent card: https://usesuperflow.ai/.well-known/agent-card.json