# Superflow vs Filestage

> Filestage is a proofing tool. Superflow is a QA tool plus AI agents built from your checklist. They check every change; clients approve from a link.

This is the Markdown copy of https://usesuperflow.ai/comparisons/superflow-vs-filestage, published for AI agents and scripts. The HTML page is canonical.

## Key facts

| Field | Value |
| --- | --- |
| Page type | Head-to-head comparison |
| URL | https://usesuperflow.ai/comparisons/superflow-vs-filestage |
| Compares | Superflow vs Filestage |
| Facts checked on | 2026-07-01 |
| Disclosure | Published by Superflow. Superflow is one of the tools compared. |
| Last updated | 2026-07-01 |

## Dimension by dimension

| Dimension | Superflow | Filestage | Verdict |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Who checks the site | Agents run your checklist. Every change, desktop and mobile. Findings land as pinned comments, rationale attached. | AI Review Agents scan uploaded files for typos, spelling, logos, and forbidden terms, Business plan and up, capped at 50 agent credits a month. For live websites, a person reviews what loads at the URL. (verified July 2026) | Filestage's agents catch mistakes in a file before a person opens it. Ours catch mistakes on the live site itself, the part a file can't show. |
| How the client says yes | Multi-step review flows: agents check, your team gates, then the client. Your client opens a link and taps Approve. No account, no login, no app, from their phone. | Reviewer groups per stage, due dates, automated reminders, one-click Approve or Request changes. No account needed to review. On higher tiers, a Verified approval adds a signed, audit-ready sign-off. (verified July 2026) | Filestage's approval workflow is as formal as ours. Call this one even: the difference shows up elsewhere, in what gets checked before the gate opens. |
| Where you review | Superflow lives on the site itself: passwords, Okta, SSO, no extension needed, guests included. Findings tagged by device. | Live websites load by URL in real time. No saved history of past versions. Private or authenticated sites need Filestage's IP addresses whitelisted, not a reviewer login. (verified July 2026) | Filestage embeds a URL. Superflow reviews the site logged in, with SSO, no extension. Behind a password is where the gap shows. |
| What stays private | Internal-only notes your team sees and the client never does. The debate stays private; the client sees one settled answer. | Team-only comments keep discussion private between teammates and creatives, Starter plan and up. (verified July 2026) | Both keep the argument away from the client. Even. |
| What gets captured | Element and text pins, area comments. A screenshot attaches to every comment automatically. Recordings: screen, video, voice, from the toolbar. | Timestamped annotations on video and audio, plus comments on images, documents, and live sites. A screenshot saves automatically for each website comment. Other file types: not yet verified. Session recordings: not yet verified. (verified July 2026 except where noted) | Filestage's annotations are detailed. Automatic screenshots on every comment type, and screen, video, and voice recordings: not yet verified on their side. |
| What it remembers | Brand rules and past decisions, learned once, fed to the agents next project. | No project-wide memory concept verified. Agents use only the context you configure per project: brand guidelines, forbidden terms, uploaded compliance docs. (checked July 2026) | The tenth project should not start like the first. |
| How it fits your stack | Custom statuses, client gates, kanban. Two-way Asana, Monday, ClickUp. Slack built in. | Jira, Monday, Slack, Teams, Zapier, Make, Adobe apps, and Google Drive folder sync, plus API and webhooks. Jira and Monday push versions, due dates, and statuses out. Full two-way ticket sync: not yet verified. (verified July 2026 except where noted) | Filestage pushes updates out to Monday and Jira. If a two-way board is your spine, weigh that honestly. |

## Scorecard

| Measure | Filestage | Superflow |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Who checks the site | AI agents scan files, Business plan and up; a person reviews live sites | agents, from your checklist |
| How the client says yes | no account needed; reviewer groups, due dates, reminders, Approve or Request changes; Verified sign-off on higher tiers | a recorded approval: team gate, then client gate |
| Where you review | live URL embed, real time, no saved history; private sites need IP whitelisting, not a reviewer login | live site, behind logins and SSO, no extension |
| What stays private | team-only comments, Starter plan and up | internal-only comments |
| What gets captured | timestamped video and audio annotations; automatic screenshots on website comments; session recordings - | automatic screenshots; screen, video, voice |
| What it remembers | no | Memory, per client |
| How it fits your stack | Jira, Monday, Slack, Teams, Zapier, Make, Adobe apps, Google Drive; two-way ticket sync - | statuses, client gates, kanban; two-way Asana, Monday, ClickUp; Slack |
| What it costs | EUR 0 / EUR 199 / EUR 329 per month, 10 seats included, +5 seat bundles (July 2026) | Free plan; Growth $29 per seat/mo ($24 annual); Scale $34; Enterprise custom |

## Where Superflow fits

Filestage's approval workflow is genuinely thorough. Reviewer groups, due dates, and reminders keep a review on schedule. Reviewers never need an account. It reviews video, images, documents, and live websites in one place, and its AI Review Agents catch typos and brand slips before a person opens the file.

## Pricing

Verified July 2026: Free EUR 0, Starter EUR 199, Business EUR 329 per month, Enterprise custom. 10 seats included, add-on bundles of 5. Reviewers are unlimited and free. AI Review Agents start on the Business plan.

From the Growth plan. See /pricing.

## Sources

- https://filestage.io
- https://filestage.io/pricing
- https://filestage.io/supported-file-types
- https://help.filestage.io/en/articles/5755744
- https://help.filestage.io/en/articles/5755764
- https://help.filestage.io/en/articles/5977284

## Questions and answers

### Is Superflow just Filestage with AI added?

No. Filestage's agents scan uploaded files for typos and brand slips. Superflow's agents check the live site itself, every change, and a person makes every call.

### Do the agents replace my reviewers?

No. Agents run the first pass. Your team, then your client, signs off.

### What happens to our Filestage projects?

Finish them in Filestage. Start new work in Superflow. Nothing migrates on day one.

### Will our clients have to learn a new tool?

No. They get a link and an Approve button. No account, no login, no app, from their phone.

### We also proof documents and video in Filestage.

Keep Filestage for that. Superflow reviews the live site: pages, forms, and flows a document can't show.

### What does it cost?

From the Growth plan. See /pricing.

## Related pages

Each of these also publishes a Markdown copy at its own path plus `.md`.

- [The 5 best Filestage alternatives](https://usesuperflow.ai/alternative/filestage-alternative)
- [Superflow vs BugHerd](https://usesuperflow.ai/comparisons/superflow-vs-bugherd)
- [AI review agents](https://usesuperflow.ai/ai-review-agents)

## About Superflow

Superflow is a website and creative-asset review tool. Its agents watch every page of a site, report what changed, and route findings to the people who approve them. Teams leave contextual feedback on live sites, staging environments, PDFs, images, videos, and Lottie animations, and comments sync two-way with Asana, ClickUp, Monday, Slack, Webflow, and Google Tag Manager.

Machine-readable entry points:

- Site index: https://usesuperflow.ai/llms.txt
- Full site content in one fetch: https://usesuperflow.ai/llms-full.txt
- Free tools, with a Markdown copy of each: https://usesuperflow.ai/tools.md
- MCP server (Streamable HTTP, no account and no API key): https://usesuperflow.ai/api/mcp
- Agent card: https://usesuperflow.ai/.well-known/agent-card.json